



Services
Pulse’s aim is to work with entities interested in constructing a fiber-



I’ve heard a lot about wireless technologies, including WI-
Simple – these technologies do not provide sufficient bandwidth to offer advanced
services and, due to the bandwidth limitation will rapidly become obsolete. Investment
is this technology, as others have found out is risky, since when competing technologies
are deployed in the area (even cable modem or higher speed DSL service), nearly all
customers tend to migrate away from these services. It is certainly tempting as there
are a number of wireless providers who advertise a low cost of entry however the
old axiom “you get what you pay for” holds true. Satellite enabled data, in particular,
provides relatively little value to your members in terms of increased speeds and
generally is costly for your members (many satellite data products charge upwards
of $70 per month for speeds of less than 768 Kbps).
WiFi and WiMAX are great technologies
and can complement wireline solutions by providing “hot spots” in town squares, restaurants,
and other public areas. It is widely acknowledged however these technologies are
not sufficient to address the long-
Based on the
growing bandwidth needs of Americans, we advocate building an advanced, scalable
fiber-
Fiber-
How is the FTTH solution offered by Pulse Broadband different than other FTTH architectures on the market?
One of Pulse’s founders, Dave Pangrac, has been widely recognized over the years
for his contributions to the development of innovative network architecture, including
developing hybrid-
The key difference between Pulse’s architecture and conventional
“PON” architecture is as follows:
Conventional FTTH Designs

Notice that the above design requires one fiber for each home passed. This could mean that there could be as many as 400 fibers emanating from a node! This is a costly proposition and creates risk to the extent the fiber is cut (imagine matching and splicing 400 fibers to restore service!).
Pulse’s FTTH Architecture

Note that Pulse’s design relies on only 4-
Has Pulse’s design been tested?
Pulse’s design has been deployed over the past 3 years at major telecommunications
operators including Comcast, Time Warner, Bresnan and a number of others. These operators
have generally deployed the solution in new developments (again since cable operators
have large historical investments in hybrid-
OK, entering the telecommunications space with FTTH seems like an interesting proposition
-
Pulse’s managers have decades of experience deploying and managing telecommunications
services. See management bios [link] section for backgrounds of the management team.
In addition to our experience and track record, Pulse brings a comprehensive and
tested approach to deploying and managing telecommunications services. Our approach,
that we term “the Secret Sauce” is comprised of a set of management processes and
reporting tools that allows us, and you, to have full visibility to all aspects of
the your customer’s experience. You will have control of the key service decisions
related to the business and can rely on Pulse to advise and execute on your decisions.
As a manager, you will have access to a “portal” that will provide you visibility
to key information including customer activity (service connects, disconnects), network
performance and technical and customer care statistics. Our metrics have been developed
over a number of years and have helped companies achieve leading results.
Pulse’s
services can be tailored to your individual needs. Our “turnkey” solution allows
you to make the key product and service delivery decisions and engages Pulse in delivering
substantially all aspects of the telecommunication services. For instance, at the
outset of the project we would meet with you to determine the product mix, marketing
plan and projected results. We would then deliver the service (including installation,
customer care, plant maintenance, etc.), over your FTTH network, and provide you
with reports detailing key measurements. We would meet with you frequently to discuss
goals and results. Alternatively, we can work with your existing staff on certain
service elements, for example customer care, and train your staff to handle telecommunications
customer care.
Finally, our Broadband Boulevard™ open access model allows you as the network to
receive revenues by allowing best-
Sounds like the way to go. How do I go about getting financing for the project?
A FTTH project results in a long term asset to your cooperative. Pulse has extensively discussed our approach with major cooperative lenders and determined that in most cases constructing a fiber network can be fully financed with debt. Pulse is available at no or minimal cost to provide support in raising the funds necessary to finance the project.
I am interested in discussing this opportunity, what are the next steps?
We at Pulse Broadband would be happy to discuss this opportunity with your cooperative.
We suggest an initial phone meeting followed by an in-
Why should my cooperative enter the telecommunications market? Why now?
Entering the telecommunications market can allow you to provide value to your members
by offering them advanced services and at the same time provide an attractive financial
return to the cooperative.
Electric cooperatives have a number of inherent advantages
over existing and “new” telecommunications providers.
You have the ability to add tremendous value in your community by improving quality of life, creating jobs and saving your members money.
Entering the market seems risky and time consuming. We and our colleagues have tried other businesses (propane, wireless internet, etc.) and had mixed success. Why is this different?
Technology to deploy telecommunications services continues to decline in cost and increase in capacity. It has reached a point to where advanced services, such as voice over IP (with unlimited domestic long distance), advanced video (including high definition and video on demand) and extremely fast internet connectivity (100 Mbps) can be deployed cost effectively. In addition, using inexpensive sources of financing places little financial risk on your cooperative and partnering with an experience telecommunication service provider, such as Pulse, minimizes the operational/execution risk. Municipalities across the country are beginning to successfully deploy fiber networks and they do not share certain of the advantages that you as an electric cooperative have.
So I’ve decided to investigate further. What are the available technologies to use to provide telecommunications services?
A number of technologies are in use by telecommunications providers. In general you would want to evaluate the following technologies:
|
Technology |
Capacity |
Reliability |
Cost |
Other Considerations |
|
Pulse FTTH
|
Better than 100 Mbs high speed data service can be offered today. Network infrastructure capable of significantly more
|
High reliability, easy to repair and contains relatively few network components
|
Approximately $16,000 per mile for aerial, $28,000 per mile for underground. Inexpensive to maintain and uses little power. |
Ability to use standard converts and other customer premise equipment.
|
|
Other FTTH (PON)
|
High capacity however capacity is throttled at the switch. Most current deployments are for 622 Mbs shared by 32 or more customers. This limits high speed data speeds with current electronics to approximately 50 Mbs.
|
Reliable however difficult to repair due to large number of fibers in back yard easements. |
Estimated to be $40,000 - |
Electronics are under development for network speeds up to 10 Gbs.
|
|
Verizon FiOS
|
Currently using BPON architecture with highest burst speed 50 Mbs downstream |
Reliable however difficult to repair due to large number of fibers.
|
Estimated to be $40,000 -
|
FiOS (Fiber Optic Services) is Verizon's branding name for FTTH network architecture. |
|
Hybrid Fiber Coax
|
Moderate
|
Moderately reliable, contains numerous network components making it costly to maintain
|
Approximately $14,000 per mile for aerial, $26,000 per mile for underground.
|
Large imbedded base of existing coaxial networks
|
|
WiFi
|
Limited to relatively slow speed, not sufficient for offering more than a limited video service
|
Susceptible to weather interference and varies with proximity to transmitter
|
Moderately expensive to deploy to limited range. Cost will increase to reach smaller cell sizes. |
Increased capacity is under development (3G, 4G, etc) however will need to be tied together with fiber networks.
|
|
vDSL
|
Limited ability to offer video programming (video over IP)
|
Signal degrades based on distance from central office
|
Relatively inexpensive to deploy |
Large embedded base of copper network. Speed limited to distance from Central Office. |
|
Broadband over Power Lines
|
Limited to relatively slow speed, not sufficient for offering video service
|
Susceptible to weather interference
|
Relatively inexpensive to deploy |
Problems are anticipated with interference to other existing communications systems
|
|
Satellite (e.g. Wild Blue)
|
Limited to slow speed internet access
|
Susceptible to weather interference |
No cost to resell but costly to the end user |
Physical time needed to send information to/from Satellite is approximately .25 seconds |

Why should my cooperative enter the telecommunications market? Why now?
Has Pulse’s design been tested?
Sounds like the way to go. How do I go about getting financing for the project?
I am interested in discussing this opportunity, what are the next steps?